|
In the Eye of the Beholder: Changing
Social Perceptions of the Florida Manatee
Theresa L. Goedeke
Bangs (1895), a biologist with the Museum of Comparative Biology
at Harvard University, lamented the rarity of manatees in Florida
in the late 1800s. He blamed their scarceness on over-harvest,
as well as increasing settlement and development in Florida.
Bangs worried that "reduced to a mere remnant…it
takes but small change in its surroundings to wipe it forever
from the face of the earth" (p. 782). Although early naturalists
like Bangs were concerned about Florida manatees early in American
history, ignorance about their existence and habits in large
part prevailed. Consequently, the species was the object of
casual slaughter, despite passage of a state law prohibiting
harvest in 1893 and subjecting those who feared or despised
the manatee to harassment and torture.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s a Dog’s Life: Elevating Status from Pet to
“Fur Baby” at Yappy Hour
Jessica Greenebaum
Nonhuman animals always have played a significant role in people’s
lives. Lately, the technological and market economy has anthropomorphized
dogs to human-like behavior, particularly to status of family
member or child. This qualitative study expands upon the current
studies on consumption and animals and society by exploring
how human-canine relationships are anthropomorphized at the
family excursion to “Yappy Hour” at Fido’s
Barkery. The type of person who attends Yappy Hour on a weekly
basis has a unique and special type of connection with their
dog that goes beyond most people’s relationships with
dogs. Most of the dog lovers interviewed do not perceive their
dogs as dogs; they are family members, best friends, and “fur
babies.” These dog lovers also do not perceive themselves
as dog owners; they see themselves as mothers and fathers. The
social and market environment of Fido’s Barkery not only
reinforces their relationship with their dog, it shapes community,
friendships, and personal identity.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Modification of the Pet Attitude Scale
Kathleen L. Munsell, Merle Canfield, Donald I. Templer , Kimberly
Tangan, and Hiroko Arikawa
This study recruited 203 college students to help determine
clarity and precision in the wording of four items in the Templer,
Salter, Baldwin, Dickey, and Veleber (1981) Pet Attitude Scale
(PAS). Half the college students received the original format,
and half received the modified wording format. The correlation
with total score did not differ for three of the pairs of items.
For one of the items, the correlation was higher with the original
wording. The 18-item Pet Attitude Scale--Modified retains the
original wording for that item and uses the modified wording
for the other three items.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Not by Bread Alone: Symbolic Loss, Trauma, and Recovery in Elephant
Communities
Isabel Gay A. Bradshaw
Like many humans in the wake of genocide and war, most wildlife
today has sustained trauma. High rates of mortality, habitat
destruction, and social breakdown precipitated by human actions
are unprecedented in history. Elephants are one of many species
dramatically affected by violence. Although elephant communities
have processes, rituals, and social structures for responding
to trauma--grieving, mourning, and socialization--the scale,
nature, and magnitude of human violence have disrupted their
ability to use these practices. Absent the cultural, carrier
groups (murdered elephant matriarchs and elders) who traditionally
lead and teach these healing practices, humans must assume the
role. Trauma theory has brought attention to victims’
severe, sustained psychological damage. Looking through the
lens of trauma theory provides a better understanding of how
systematic violence has affected individuals and groups and
how the pervasive nature of traumatic events affects human-nonhuman
animal relationships. The framing of recent trauma theory compels
conservationists to create new relationships--neither anthropocentric
nor power-based--with nonhuman animals. The David Sheldrick
Wildlife Trust, Kenya, shows how humans, taking on the role
of interspecies witness, bring orphan elephants back to health
and help re-build elephant communities shattered by genocide.
For
FULL TEXT of all issues, including the most current, click FULL
TEXT
To order Society
& Animals Journal, go to our secure online
ordering page
You
can Search the online issues of Society & Animals, as well
as the entire Society & Animals Forum (formerly PSYETA)
website,
for topics and keywords of your interest:
|