|
A Bird in the House: An Anthropological Perspective on Companion
Parrots
Patricia K. Anderson
Although companion birds are the third most-common animal companion
-- after dogs and cats -- in U.S. households, few anthrozoological
publications focus on them. This study examines the role of
companion parrots in American households. The study combines
a literature review with the results of a survey of bird owners
and participant observation. The study uses the resulting qualitative
and quantitative data in addressing the social dynamics of companion
parrot ownership in the household. The data support the impression
that companion parrots increasingly are being considered family
members, or “Fids” (“Feathered Kids”), thus following current
trends in American society that accord companion animals in
general a greater investment in time, money, and emotion. However,
the general public is not well informed about the complexities
of captive parrot care, and psittacine wellness is an important
concern.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Development of
the P.E.T. Scale for the Measurement of Physical and Emotional
Tormenting Against Animals in Adolescents
Anna C. Baldry
The Physical and Emotional Tormenting Against Animals Scale
(P.E.T.) is a new self-administered scale to measure physical
and emotional abuse against animals among adolescents. This
study is a first attempt to establish the reliability and validity
of this newly developed scale with a non-clinical sample of
1396 Italian adolescents, aged 11-17 years. The scale measures
different dimensions of animal abuse, ranging from mild to more
severe: bothering, tormenting, hitting, harming, and being cruel
to an animal. The scale measures the prevalence and frequency
of directed and witnessed abuse against animals. Principal components
analysis suggested a two factor solution, with factors labeled
“direct” and “indirect” animal abuse;
internal consistency was good for each factor. The direct animal
abuse factor was significantly correlated with the Child Behavior
Checklist’s single item assessing engagement in cruelty
against animals. These findings suggest that the PET scale has
potential as an instrument for the measurement of animal abuse.
Future studies of the PET scale’s psychometric properties,
and cross-validation on new populations, are needed.
Key words: animal abuse, scale validation, adolescents
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Moby-Dick and Compassion
Philip Armstrong
Because the notions
of “anthropomorphism” and “sentimentality”
often are used pejoratively to dismiss research in human-animal
studies, there is much to be gained from ongoing and detailed
analysis of the changing “structures of feeling”
that shape representations and treatments of nonhuman animals.
Literary criticism contributes to this project when it pays
due attention to differences in historical and cultural contexts.
As an example of this approach, a reading of the humanization
of cetaceans in Herman Melville’s Moby-Dick--and more
broadly in nineteenth-century whaling discourse--demonstrates
how radically human feelings for nonhuman species are affected
by shifting material and ideological conditions.
It is only recently that literary critics have begun to explore
historically the changing representations of the human-nonhuman
animal relationship in romanticism or early modernity (Bate,
2000; Fudge, 2000; Boehrer, 2002). This seems surprising, especially
because the dedication of literary texts to documentation of
the subjective minutiae of everyday life would seem to offer
a mechanism finely calibrated for recording how humans have
been disposed to animals in particular times and places. As
a demonstration of this, my argument will focus on Melville’s
Moby-Dick, as a case history of the ways in which interactions
between literature and other cultural practices both produce
and reflect historically-specific attitudes, especially feelings
of compassion, toward nonhuman animals.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From Animal Abuse to Interhuman Violence? A Critical Review
of the Progression Thesis
Piers Beirne
This paper reviews evidence of a progression from animal abuse
to interhuman violence. It finds that the “progression
thesis” is supported not by a coherent research program
but by disparate studies often lacking methodological and conceptual
clarity. Set in the context of a debate about the theoretical
adequacy of concepts like “animal abuse” and “animal
cruelty,” it suggests that the link between animal abuse
and interhuman violence should be sought not only in the personal
biographies of those individuals who abuse animals but also
in those institutionalized social practices where animal abuse
is routine, widespread, and socially acceptable.
Key words: animal abuse, assaultive children, cruelty, institutionalized
abuse, longitudinal analysis
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Human-Animal Bond and Self Psychology: Toward a New Understanding
Sue-Ellen Brown
The purpose of this paper is to introduce and define self psychology
and its concepts (self and selfobject) so that they can be applied
toward a new understanding of the human-nonhuman animal bond.
The paper utilizes selected literature from both self-psychology
and the human-animal bond fields. The paper contains four primary
conclusions:
1. Self psychology provides a unique model for understanding
the depth and meaning of human-animal relationships;
2. Companion animals and humans can be equally important in
their selfobject roles;
3. Self psychology can offer a model for understanding individual
differences in attachment to companion animals; and
4. A future direction includes finding ways to assess self psychology
constructs in order to measure the depth and function of the
selfobject relationship.
Although the benefits of companion animals to human health have
attracted a lot of scientific interest and research (Friedman,
Thomas, & Eddy, 2000; Garrity & Stallones, 1998), theoretical
conceptualizations of why the human-pet bond is beneficial are
lacking.
For
FULL TEXT of all issues, including the most current, click FULL
TEXT
To
order Society & Animals Journal, go to our secure online
ordering page
You
can Search the online issues of Society & Animals, as well
as the entire Society & Animals Forum (formerly PSYETA)
website,
for topics and keywords of your interest:
|