|
Dogmen: The Rationalization of Deviance
Craig J. Forsyth and Rhonda D. Evans
TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY
Dogmen are individuals who fight their pit bulls in matches against other pit
bulls. This paper uses neutralization theory to examine the rationalizations of
dogmen as they attempt to counter stigma and criminal identity in a world that
is becoming increasingly intolerant of dogfighting. To maintain their
rationalizations, the dogmen use four recurring techniques: (a) denial of
injury;(b) condemnation of the condemners; (c) appeal to higher loyalties; and
(d) a defense that says dogmen are good people (their deviance-dogfighting
expunged by their good character). The authors conducted interviews with 31
individuals who fight and breed pit bulls and with significant others in the
dogfighting enterprise, including Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to
Animals (SPCA) officials, veterinarians, and local law enforcement officers. The
research also examined newspaper accounts of dogfighting. This article provides
some insights into the social construction of reality of individuals who engage
in an activity that most of us find reprehensible. As with any criminal/deviant
behavior, understanding and subsequent solving of the problem begin with
knowledge of the offender=s perspective.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Health Correlates of Compatibility and Attachment in Human-Companion Animal
Relationships
R. Claire Budge, J. Spicer, B. Jones, and R. St. George
MASSEY UNIVERSITY, NEW ZEALAND
The relationship between animal ownership and owners' health has received
increasing attention in the recent human-companion animal literature. This
article considers a new aspect of the human-companion animal relationship, that
of compatibility between pet and owner. Compatibility is viewed as the fit
between the animal and the owner on physical, behavioral, and psychological
dimensions. A postal survey was used to test the hypothesis that compatibility
has influences on physical and mental health that are independent of those
because of owners' level of pet attachment and human social support. A sample
group of 176 pet owners completed a questionnaire containing a new measure of
compatibility as well as standard measures of pet attachment, human social
support, and mental and physical health. Results of multiple regression analyses
indicated that people who are relatively more compatible with their pets report
better mental health overall and fewer physical symptoms. Social support was
positively associated with mental health. Pet attachment was also positively
associated with mental health, but negatively with physical health.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Who Said That? Status Presentation in Media Accounts of the Animal
Experimentation Debate
Corwin R. Kruse
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA
In recent years, the issue of experimentation upon nonhuman animals has become
the subject of media attention. One aspect of the media presentation is the
status attributed to claims-makers on either side of the issue. Research
suggests that perceived expertise of the source of arguments can play a role in
attitudes formed by audiences. This study examines mainstream print and
broadcast media presentation of the status of individuals quoted regarding the
issue of animal experimentation. Those supporting continued experimentation are
significantly more likely to be presented as professionals or experts. Attitude
formation is discussed in light of these findings.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Heart of the Matter: Animal Bodies, Ethics, and Species Boundaries
Lynda Birke and Mike Michael
UNIVERSITY OF LANCASTER, UNITED KINGDOM
This article addresses some of the ways in which the development of
xenotransplantation, the use of nonhuman animals as organ donors, are presented
in media accounts. Although xenotransplantation raises many ethical and
philosophical questions, media coverage typically minimizes these. At issue are
widespread public concerns about the transgression of species boundaries,
particularly those between humans and other animals. We consider how these are
constructed in media narratives, and how those narratives, in turn, rely on
particular scientific discourses that posit species boundary crossing as
unproblematic.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Poetic Animals and Animal Souls
Randy Malamud
GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY
Mesoamericans' rich spiritual beliefs about the importance of animals and about
the correlation between the well-being of animals and that of human beings
contrast with a diminutive respect accorded to animals in industrialized
cultures. Some vestige of a parallel sensibility, however -- granting animals an
aura of dignity relatively independent of anthropocentric constructions -- may
be detected in the animal poetry of selected Western writers including Marianne
Moore, Gary Snyder, and José Emilio Pacheco. Such animal poetry, although
possessing no explicit links to Mesoamerican spirituality, may represent an
ethos extant (albeit rare) in industrial-world culture that quietly celebrates
-- as Mesoamerican culture does more unabashedly -- the sanctity and parity of
nonhuman animals.
For
FULL TEXT of all issues, including the most current, click
FULL TEXT
To
order Society & Animals Journal, go to our secure online
ordering page
You
can Search the online issues of Society & Animals, as well
as the entire Society & Animals Forum (formerly PSYETA)
website,
for topics and keywords of your interest:
|